From the May 2007 Idaho Observer:
Court affirms 2nd Amendment confers individuals’ right to keep and bear arms Decision gives Unmistakable Tyranny Project a boost
Court affirms 2nd Amendment confers individuals’ right to keep and bear arms
Decision gives Unmistakable Tyranny Project a boost
BELLEVUE, Washington—The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied a petition from the District of Columbia for a hearing of Parker v. District of Columbia [D.C. Cir., No. 047041] before the full court was "right and proper," said Alan M. Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation. "This is a strong signal that the D.C. Court of Appeals, which is the second most powerful court in the country, feels the original ruling by Senior Judge Laurence H. Silberman is solid," Gottlieb stated. "It is now up to the district to accept the ruling and begin the process of licensing handguns to be kept legally in district residences, or to appeal the case to the Supreme Court."
The Parker case has become the most significant Second Amendment case in the nation’s history, because for the first time, a gun control law was struck down on the grounds that it violated the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Judge Silberman’s ruling found that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to bear arms that goes beyond service in a militia. "The time is long past due for the Supreme Court to hear a case that has such gravity in terms of the Second Amendment and its true meaning," Gottlieb observed. "For almost 70 years, a state of confusion has existed over whether the Second Amendment protects an individual’s civil right, as we are certain it does, rather than affirming some convoluted ‘collective right’ of the states to form militias. That interpretation has been carefully fabricated over the years by anti-gun zealots whose ultimate goal is to strip American citizens of their firearms rights.
"We think this question must be answered," he continued, "to forever silence those gun control extremists who have been misinterpreting—we believe deliberately—the 1939 U.S. v Miller case in an on-going effort to destroy the cornerstone of the Bill of Rights, and the foundation for liberty in this country. This appears to be the right case, and this is certainly the right time."
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nations oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control. On behalf of American gun owners, SAF previously funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles; New Haven, CT; and San Francisco. SAF also filed lawsuits against the cities suing gun makers and an amicus brief and fund for the Emerson case holding the Second Amendment as an individual right.
Note: At the request of 2nd Amendment prisoner Norman David Somerville, The IO sent Judge Silberman a copy of "Unmistakable Tyranny" (go to www.inmatehope.comand click on "publications)) in December, 2006. Somerville compiled and edited Unmistakable Tyranny, a compendium of historical and contemporary opinions and rulings by authoritative bodies to answer the question, "Does the 2nd Amendment confer individuals’ right to keep and bear arms or does it provide a collective right held by the state?"
Unmistakable Tyranny proves that the right belongs to individuals and is not to be "infringed" upon by the state. Until Judge Silberman’s March 9, 2007 ruling (upheld under appeal by the full court May 8, 2007) the federal judiciary was consistently upholding "collectivist right" claims argued by the U.S. Department of Justice. Did Unmistakable Tyranny have any bearing on Judge Silberman’s ruling? Has the fact that key jurists, politicians, attorneys, 2nd Amendment prisoners and activists have received copies of Unmistakable Tyranny contributed to the court’s about face on the people’s right to defend themselves?
It is hard to say, though the timing is interesting.
One could say that the 2nd Amendment issue is "ripe" for the Supreme Court: In the wake of the Virginia Tech massacre, people are beginning to think that responsible, law-abiding people should be armed because the streets are obviously not safer when only cops and criminals have guns. Consider being part of the Unmistakable Tyranny Project. (see page 24)
Home - Current Edition
Advertising Rate Sheet
About the Idaho Observer
Some recent articles
Some older articles
Why we're here
Corrections and Clarifications
Vaccination Liberation - vaclib.org
The Idaho Observer
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869