From the October 2004 Idaho Observer:
A Policy of Conspiracy
By Hari Heath
In the beginning of the video, "9/11 In Plane Site," host Dave vonKleist plays a word association game with the word "conspiracy."
The demonstration suggests that we have been conditioned to associate the word conspiracy with theory, as in "conspiracy theory."
Through natural conditioning, we have come to associate conspiracy and theory as an inseparable phrase. Itís part of the program laid by the media and those who feed the information it so willingly repeats until it fills the vacuum of the mass mind. This is often the result, when we allow ourselves to be collectively unconscious.
Who would want to impress such an association upon the mass mind? Parties who engage in conspiracy benefit by having them readily dismissed as mere theories; notions without evidence. The collectively unconscious citizenry can go about their business, undisturbed by any further notions of conspiracies because they are all a bunch of theories. The video, 9/11 In Plane Site, quotes President Bush as saying, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September eleventh; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves; away from the guilty."
Given the evidence presented in von Kleistís video, as well many other sources, the conspiracy of 9/11 is real and the evidence lays culpability at the feet of the current administration. The above quote exemplifies the attempt to shift blame from the real conspirators by demonizing the messengers and portraying the evidence and unanswered questions as mere "theories."
What is a conspiracy? The mental association that most people have with "conspiracy" resembles something like a Mafia organization or a secret cabal of globalist leaders planning to take over the world. In reality, itís much simpler than that: It only takes two to form a conspiracy.
By common dictionary definition, "conspiracy" is "a combination of two or more persons by some concerted action to accomplish some criminal or unlawful purpose, " or "an agreement to perform together an illegal, treacherous, or evil act." The Latin roots of the word are "con, together" and spire, to breathe."
In many cases conspiracy is a stand-alone crime. "In order to render the offense complete, it is not necessary that any act should be done in pursuance of the unlawful agreement entered into between the parties, or that anyone should have been defrauded or injured by it. The conspiracy is the gist of the crime."
Idahoís conspiracy statute has a slightly more elevated standard: "If two or more persons combine or conspire to commit any crime or offense prescribed by the laws of the state of Idaho, and any one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of the combination or conspiracy, each shall be punishable upon conviction in the same manner and to the same extent as ... [for] the crime or offenses that each combined to commit (Idaho Code 18-1701)."
Do you remember the foundational concepts of our nation; that all men are created equal; we have an unalienable right to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness; government is instituted for our equal protection and benefit; that whenever government is destructive of these ends we have the right, even the duty, to abolish it and replace it with a form more likely to achieve such goals?
These forgotten principles of lawful government, based upon the historical evidence, are only "theories." There are few, if any, examples in our nationís history where such principles have been reduced to practice.
Quite the contrary, current government does everything, with all the power it can usurp, to destroy these principles. In short, we live under a policy of conspiracy. And it is a crime, literally.
A Criminal Policy
We have rights. They are inherent and antecedent to the Constitution, which should be the foundation for government. The Bill of Rights describes them and its Ninth Article declares that we possess other rights that are not enumerated therein. Conspiracy against our rights is defined in Title 18, Section 241 of U. S. Code:
"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more people go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both; and if death results from acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death."
This statute may be written to protect us from organized criminals, but who is its biggest violator? Consider the following questions:
* When the IRS seizes a citizenís bank account, absent any lawful authority and without due process, is it a criminal conspiracy?
* If BATF agents raid a gun collectorís or dealerís "premises" and steals weapons in violation of the Second Article of the Bill of Rights, is that not a crime punishable by up to 10 years? And if the collector or dealer is kidnapped (arrested), is not the prescribed punishment for this level of conspiratorial activity death?
* When the corporate officers of Diebold and election officials enter into agreements to use electronic vote counting machines and paperless touch screen machines which are known to be compromised and subject to vote fraud by remote modification of the source codes, is that not a criminal conspiracy against the American peopleís elective franchise?
* Are the Republican and Democratic parties the very definition of a conspiracy? Isnít both the Republican National Conspiracy (RNC) and the Democratic National Conspiracy (DNC) each a criminal syndicate that maintains an extensive membership who passes and executes laws which "conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate ... the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured ... by the Constitution or the laws of the United States?"
* Does the RNC and the DNC, along with their comrades in the media, conspire together to create the illusion of a two-party political system and exclude all others from political participation? Are the recent debates evidence of this, where the lawfully qualified candidates from the Constitution, Libertarian, Green Parties and Ralph Nader are excluded from the debate?
* When agents of the FDA act in concert with members of the pharmaceutical industry to "approve" known toxins for public consumption, and "death results," while simultaneously "kidnapping" (arresting) purveyors of natural health remedies, often absent any complaint or evidence of damaging conduct, is not the prescribed sentence death?
* If officers and agents of "government" conspire to fly a missile into the Pentagon and falsely claim it was an airliner; and fly Air Force-owned tankers or executive jets into the WTC Towers killing thousands of Americans to justify more draconian, unconstitutional laws to further "injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate" the American people, is that not also a crime deserving a death sentence upon conviction?
* When FBI and DOJ agents falsely alleged the 19 Islamic hijackers conspiracy theory (absent any evidence) and; when other officers in government perpetrated an unlawful war on the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, based on this and other gross misrepresentations, is this not a criminal conspiracy of the highest magnitude?
We, the accomplices
And now, dear reader, comes the hard part:
* When you pay unlawful taxes you do not owe which support a conspiracy; or apply for privileges which circumvent your rights; or comply with edicts perpetrated by unlawful administrative entities; or otherwise participate in any of the unlawful usurpations of modern "government," do you become complicit in the policy of conspiracy; do you become an accomplice?
We no longer have representative government of the people. Objective analysis evidences only an unlawful usurper regime, which operates a policy of conspiracy. "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September eleventh; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves; away from the guilty."
Regime change begins at home.
Home - Current Edition
Advertising Rate Sheet
About the Idaho Observer
Some recent articles
Some older articles
Why we're here
Corrections and Clarifications
Vaccination Liberation - vaclib.org
The Idaho Observer
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869